The Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA) is putting forward an amendment that would allow it to fine airline customers who breach confidentiality regarding complaints they file with the regulator – and passenger rights advocates are not amused.
Under the current complaint resolution process, customers and airlines are barred from publicly disclosing the outcome of complaints on matters ranging from accessible travel to refunds and compensation for a cancelled flight – unless both parties agree to waive confidentiality.
Gabor Lukacs, president of the Air Passenger Rights advocacy group, says the would-be regulatory change adds teeth to an existing “gag order” and discourages passengers from spreading the word on what their fellow travellers could be owed.
“Even if the fine was under $50, the very idea that people could be fined for exercising their freedom of expression is appalling,” he said, adding, “What is truly exceptional is that an agency would attempt to regulate anybody who is outside the transportation sector.”
The CTA said the rule would merely add standard enforcement powers to a confidentiality provision that was legislated by Parliament. It also said the move does not mean the regulator plans to flex its authority in this area, or that many complainants are discussing their case in breach of the law.
“The updates through this designation exercise are not the result of the observation of any systemic issue, and do not signal the CTA’s intent to use these authorities for the purpose of enforcing confidentiality, either with airlines or passengers, or that any penalties will be applied automatically,” said spokesman Jadrino Huot.
Complainants can talk publicly about their travel experience, he noted. But the complaint resolution process, including all documents and information submitted as well as the decision, “cannot be made public.”
The transportation agency did not lay out the fine amounts. The Canada Transportation Act caps penalties against individuals at $5,000, but the agency can set lower ceilings in its regulations.
Fines against people – rather than corporations, and usually applicable to individuals who work in transport – typically come only after a notice of violation from the watchdog. They range beyond $1,000 only in the case of multiple breaches, according to the agency’s current monetary penalties scheme.
Legal researcher John Lawford expressed concern over the silencing effect of the confidentiality provision as well as the newly proposed penalties around it.
“They’re going to be floored by this,” he said of travellers, adding that fewer may turn to the complaints process as a result. “I think it’s unfair, and it will discourage people from using it.”
Comparable processes like those at the Commission for Complaints for Telecom-television Services, a telecoms watchdog, have no confidentiality requirements, he said. “It just doesn’t seem right, having the government go after people who are just trying to get their money back.”
If this article was shared with you by a friend or colleague, you may enjoy receiving your own copy of Travel Industry Today with the latest travel news and reviews each weekday morning. It’s absolutely free – just CLICK HERE.